Jordach MakayaOperations leader · Backend & systems engineeringCasablanca · FR / EN
Leadership
Case study · Industrial feasibility · 2018–2021

Building the Case for a Battery Industry in the DRC

I co-founded Atlanta Compa International and led a CAPEX/OPEX feasibility study for a complete solid-state battery value chain in the Democratic Republic of Congo: ten plants, stakeholders in seven countries, one shared document. The most ambitious project I have led — and it stopped before financing closed.

Company
Atlanta Compa International · London
Role
Co-founder & Project Lead
Period
Nov 2018 – Jul 2021
Deliverable
25-page CAPEX/OPEX report
Logistics scenario: Dilolo, on the DRC–Angola border, linked by rail to the port of Lobito, 105 km from the Kisenge manganese deposit
Logistics scenario · The vision locationDilolo: rail to Lobito, power from Kisenge, copper, cobalt and manganese nearby
At a glance
10

industrial plants scoped, from raw feed to solid-state cells

7

countries of industrial stakeholders coordinated remotely

$7.7B

upper bound of the first-pass CAPEX envelope ($6.3–7.7B), to be confirmed by PFS/DFS

2

rounds of investor meetings held on the final report

Context

The DRC holds the minerals. The value was added elsewhere.

Lithium, cobalt, copper and manganese are abundant in the DRC, but they leave the country as raw concentrate. Atlanta Compa International proposed The Vision to Johnson Battery Technologies: build the industrial ecosystem locally, from refining to cell manufacturing, and lay the foundation for a Congolese and African battery industry.

The technology bet was solid-state: cells from Excellatron Solid State (a JBT company, USA), with modules, packs and BMS from Steatite (UK).

Industries location map: plants in the DRC, collector manufacturing in Lobito (Angola), Ni-Co refinery in Zambia, electrolyte in Atlanta (USA), modules and BMS in the UK
Industries locationTen plants in the DRC; partner sites in Angola, Zambia, the USA and the UK
The value chain we scoped
  1. 01
    Mine

    Raw feed: spodumene, tailings, MHP/MSP, Mn ore (Kisenge)

  2. 02
    Refine

    Refineries: Mn, Ni, Co sulphates, Li hydroxide/carbonate, sulphuric acid

  3. 03
    Convert

    Precursors: cathode precursor (P-CAM), Li-metal anode

  4. 04
    Build

    Components: electrolyte, separator, current collectors

  5. 05
    Assemble

    Battery: solid-state cells, modules, packs, BMS

Ten plants in total: seven in the DRC around Dilolo on the Angolan border, near the Lobito rail corridor, and three abroad — the nickel refinery in Zambia, current collectors in Lobito (Angola) and electrolyte in the USA.

My role

Carrying a project without any authority over the people in it

Atlanta had two partners, one in the DRC and one in France. Every other industrial participant joined because I found them through cold outreach and convinced them the project was worth their time.

Built the network

Identified and engaged players across the whole chain, from mining companies to battery production engineers.

Coordinated remotely

Ran the meetings and synchronised information needs between stakeholders across time zones and disciplines.

Went to the field

Visited mining sites and travelled the road network before writing a line of the logistics scenario.

Wrote the study

Produced the final CAPEX/OPEX report and contributed to the investor pitch.

USA · United Kingdom · Canada · Ukraine · DR Congo · South Africa · Zambia
Method

Estimates you can trace back to a real project

No plant in this chain existed yet in the DRC, so every figure was anchored to published feasibility studies of plants already producing or in development (PEA, PFS, DFS). For each input metal, I laid out alternative supply scenarios and priced each one, and I stated the assumptions explicitly.

Benchmark usedWhat it informedInitial CAPEX
Manganese refinery (HPEMM / HPMSM)Mn sulphate from tailings, ~1.1 Mt/yr feed$403.9M
Nickel sulphate scenario112,000 tpa Ni sulphate + Cu concentrate$646.4M
Lithium hydroxide chemical plant22,720 tpa battery-grade LiOH$376.7M
Sulphuric acid plantShared reagent for the refineries$101.6M

The study also covered power supply (DRC capacity is ~99% hydro), heat recovery across plants and circular-economy savings. All figures were flagged as to be confirmed by PFS/DFS.

Outcome
  1. 2018Project launchedVision shared with Johnson Battery Technologies; network building begins.
  2. ThroughoutField work and scenario designSite visits, supply and logistics scenarios, CAPEX benchmarking.
  3. May 2021Final report deliveredTwo rounds of favourable investor meetings, backed by a major law firm.
  4. 2021Project haltedStopped by the pandemic and the geopolitical context before financing closed. No plant was ever built: the study is the deliverable.
What I carry forward

A number is only useful if someone else can trace where it came from. That rule came from this study, and I still apply it to the software I build.

Influence without authority

Keeping volunteers from seven countries aligned for three years.

Structure under uncertainty

Breaking an unbounded problem into scenarios that can be compared.

Ground truth first

Checking roads and sites before trusting the spreadsheet.

CAPEX/OPEX · feasibility studies · supply-chain design · stakeholder management · investor pitch